<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kenneth D. Nordahl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://articles.nordahl.me/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://articles.nordahl.me</link>
	<description>articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by Raj</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi KDN, this is a great article!

I have been using cufon for the first time on one of my projects. As much as i like it, the delay and  blurriness is not ideal. Will definitely be giving this a try on Monday. Do you know if there is as much of a delay, if any using this?

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi KDN, this is a great article!</p>
<p>I have been using cufon for the first time on one of my projects. As much as i like it, the delay and  blurriness is not ideal. Will definitely be giving this a try on Monday. Do you know if there is as much of a delay, if any using this?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by KDN</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>KDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-57</guid>
		<description>@Eddy Chrome should to my knowledge take the SVG file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eddy Chrome should to my knowledge take the SVG file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by sereal</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>sereal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 10:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-51</guid>
		<description>wow...this is a must try...

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;this is a must try&#8230;</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by Eddy Proca</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Proca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Chrome doesn&#039;t seem to support truetype, do you know how to get it to work there? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome doesn&#8217;t seem to support truetype, do you know how to get it to work there? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on San Francisco by KDN</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/san-francisco/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>KDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 05:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=166#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Not the best picture, bet Bjørn have a better one somewhere. The burgers had high dense of fat so if you put the burgers back in the package while taking a sip of soda, the bottom bread part would be ruined by the burger fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best picture, bet Bjørn have a better one somewhere. The burgers had high dense of fat so if you put the burgers back in the package while taking a sip of soda, the bottom bread part would be ruined by the burger fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on San Francisco by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/san-francisco/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=166#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you guys had a blast, cool! The burger didn&#039;t really look all that great though. : D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you guys had a blast, cool! The burger didn&#8217;t really look all that great though. : D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on San Francisco by Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/san-francisco/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=166#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Stoked! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoked! <img src='http://articles.nordahl.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by Vegard Sandvold</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard Sandvold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Nice write-up on cross-browser font face usage, Kenneth!

I think your JavaScript for loading fonts needs a small adjustment in order to work with IE. $(&#039;head&#039;).append(&quot;&quot;) won&#039;t work. AFAIK, only way to make IE load a stylesheet this way is to call the non-standard function createStyleSheet().

Perhaps you want to try something like this:

$(document).ready(function() {
	var fontURL = &#039;&#039;;

	if(jQuery.browser.msie)
		fontURL = &#039;style-ie-fonts.css&#039;;
	else if(jQuery.browser.safari)
		fontURL = &#039;style-safari-fonts.css&#039;;
	else if(jQuery.browser.mozilla)
		fontURL = &#039;style-mozilla-fonts.css&#039;;
	else if(jQuery.browser.chrome)
		fontURL = &#039;style-chrome-fonts.css&#039;;

	if (document.createStyleSheet) {
		document.createStyleSheet(fontURL);
	} else {
		var cssLink = $(document.createElement(&quot;link&quot;)); 
		cssLink.attr({
			rel:  &quot;stylesheet&quot;,
			type: &quot;text/css&quot;,
			href: fontURL
		});
		$(&quot;head&quot;).append(cssLink);
	}
});</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write-up on cross-browser font face usage, Kenneth!</p>
<p>I think your JavaScript for loading fonts needs a small adjustment in order to work with IE. $(&#8216;head&#8217;).append(&#8220;&#8221;) won&#8217;t work. AFAIK, only way to make IE load a stylesheet this way is to call the non-standard function createStyleSheet().</p>
<p>Perhaps you want to try something like this:</p>
<p>$(document).ready(function() {<br />
	var fontURL = &#8221;;</p>
<p>	if(jQuery.browser.msie)<br />
		fontURL = &#8217;style-ie-fonts.css&#8217;;<br />
	else if(jQuery.browser.safari)<br />
		fontURL = &#8217;style-safari-fonts.css&#8217;;<br />
	else if(jQuery.browser.mozilla)<br />
		fontURL = &#8217;style-mozilla-fonts.css&#8217;;<br />
	else if(jQuery.browser.chrome)<br />
		fontURL = &#8217;style-chrome-fonts.css&#8217;;</p>
<p>	if (document.createStyleSheet) {<br />
		document.createStyleSheet(fontURL);<br />
	} else {<br />
		var cssLink = $(document.createElement(&#8220;link&#8221;));<br />
		cssLink.attr({<br />
			rel:  &#8220;stylesheet&#8221;,<br />
			type: &#8220;text/css&#8221;,<br />
			href: fontURL<br />
		});<br />
		$(&#8220;head&#8221;).append(cssLink);<br />
	}<br />
});</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom fonts on the web with @font-face by Lucian</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/font-face/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=8#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Oh! Thanks, again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! Thanks, again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HTML5 by KDN</title>
		<link>http://articles.nordahl.me/html5/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>KDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.nordahl.me/?p=182#comment-16</guid>
		<description>About script type: There is no need but does it help on the semantic from a person who are used to HTML4/XHTML? Guess it does not matter since the only thing the &lt;script&gt; tag is used for is javascript.

About the amount of list items in the navigation: Because I can start styling the navigation right away with the placeholder text.

About the use of section: I&#039;ve typed it up as others has been using the section tag. To me it makes more sense to have a section with content, a section with images, a section with other data etc. than having a devider with content, a devider with images, a devider with other data. 

&quot;Examples of sections would be chapters, the various tabbed pages in a tabbed dialog box, or the numbered sections of a thesis. A Web site&#039;s home page could be split into sections for an introduction, news items, contact information.&quot;
ref: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100304/semantics.html#the-section-element&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;W3C.org&lt;/a&gt;.

I see that the latest draft include the following: &quot;The section element is not a generic container element. When an element is needed for styling purposes or as a convenience for scripting, authors are encouraged to use the div element instead. A general rule is that the section element is appropriate only if the element&#039;s contents would be listed explicitly in the document&#039;s outline.&quot;

So I guess that points back to the usage of div with ID&#039;s. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About script type: There is no need but does it help on the semantic from a person who are used to HTML4/XHTML? Guess it does not matter since the only thing the &lt;script&gt; tag is used for is javascript.</p>
<p>About the amount of list items in the navigation: Because I can start styling the navigation right away with the placeholder text.</p>
<p>About the use of section: I&#8217;ve typed it up as others has been using the section tag. To me it makes more sense to have a section with content, a section with images, a section with other data etc. than having a devider with content, a devider with images, a devider with other data. </p>
<p>&#8220;Examples of sections would be chapters, the various tabbed pages in a tabbed dialog box, or the numbered sections of a thesis. A Web site&#8217;s home page could be split into sections for an introduction, news items, contact information.&#8221;<br />
ref: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100304/semantics.html#the-section-element" rel="nofollow">W3C.org</a>.</p>
<p>I see that the latest draft include the following: &#8220;The section element is not a generic container element. When an element is needed for styling purposes or as a convenience for scripting, authors are encouraged to use the div element instead. A general rule is that the section element is appropriate only if the element&#8217;s contents would be listed explicitly in the document&#8217;s outline.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I guess that points back to the usage of div with ID&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
